Criteria for critiquing a research paper

Communication difficulties arise even when a translator is available, and non-verbal messages may be missed by the patient or even by the health professional.

This will demonstrate how the study is capable of achieving its aims. Evidence of a literature review that is relevant and recent, critically appraising other works, not merely describing them Background information to the study, to orientate the reader to the problem Hypothesis or aims of the study Rationale for the study that justifies its need, i.

Materials and Methods Similar to a recipe, the description of materials and methods will allow others to replicate the study elsewhere if needed. Discussion This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings.

Were there threats to the reliability and validity of the study and were these controlled for? It should both contain and justify the exact specifications of selection criteria, sample size, response rate and any statistics used. Introduction This should include: Final Thoughts Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace.

There were any major omissions in the results, which could indicate bias Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes The data generated is consistent with the data collected Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias.

There may also be recommendations for further research. It should not introduce any new material, but should address how the aims of the study have been met. What proportion of the eligible sample participated?

How to Critique a Research Article

Any limitations of the study, including bias, should be clearly presented. Conclusions These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size.

Were there any obvious biases?

What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study? Unfortunately this is not always the case. Publication bias can occur when editors only accept manuscripts that have a bearing on the direction of their own research, or reject manuscripts with negative findings.

References These should be relevant to the study, be up to date, and should provide a comprehensive list of citations within the text. The discussion should use previous research work and theoretical concepts as the context in which the new study can be interpreted. If a trial was undertaken, was it randomised, case controlled, blinded or double-blinded?

Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by existing literature.Dismissing a point of view through an evaluation of its criteria Table 1). If the paper was not published in a peer-reviewed journal, consider the credibility of the Table 1: Elements of a Research Critique and Questions to Consider in Writing a Critique Elements of a research critique.

How to Critique a Research Article | Ausmed | Let's briefly examine some basic research and pointers on how to perform a literature review. It should both contain and justify the exact specifications of selection criteria, sample size, response rate and any statistics used.

This will demonstrate how the study is capable of achieving its. Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers 18 July, The first article in this series on understanding research (Lee, a) examined the basic terminology used by researchers and identified that qualitative research produced non-numerical (qualitative) data.

Quantitative Article Critique: Factors Affecting the Successful Employment of Transition-Age Youths research was cited to show correlations between each variable and finding employment.

I noticed, however, that the authors cited research that studied youths with disabilities, secondary set certain criteria and selected the sample from.

review the essential scientific elements of a research article against criteria for a well written article, and formulate an informed assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of Conducting an article critique for a quantitative research study.

Vance et al. article.). Students research paper quiz fritz hansen essay table replicate comedy drama essay writing, an arguementative research paper iq and eq essay writing essay on women role in society criteria for evaluation bullying essay solution of social problems essay dual perspective essay.

Criteria for critiquing a research paper
Rated 5/5 based on 6 review